30.66B.150 Concurrency determination – revision required.
(1) A concurrency determination shall be revised if one or more of the following occurs:
(a) The developer proposes changes to the development proposal that would:
(i) Cause the approved traffic generation of the prior approval to be exceeded;
(ii) Change points of access or circulation and the county engineer determines the change will increase traffic volumes on any arterial unit;
(iii) Change mitigation measures relating to the transportation system; or
(iv) Increase traffic volumes on any arterial units;
(b) The concurrency determination was based on phasing and the developer proposes changes to the development proposal prior to the final approval that would move up the occupancy dates for all or part of the development to earlier phases;
(c) The concurrency determination was procured by misrepresentation, lack of material disclosure, or the data or analysis upon which the concurrency determination was made is found to have gross material errors;
(d) The property boundaries for which the concurrency determination was issued have changed; or
(e) A developer chooses either to not implement or discontinue a trip reduction program under SCC 30.66B.680.
(2) Any development requiring revision to an approved concurrency determination will be subject to an additional review fee at the rate identified as the base review fee in SCC 13.110.030. (Added by Amended Ord. 02-064, Dec. 9, 2002, Eff date Feb. 1, 2003; Amended by Ord. 16-010, June 1, 2016, Eff date June 15, 2016).